End Hazing in Medicine

$68,166 a year. Divide by the hours. The picture changes.

Almost every hospital pays the same base across fields: 96.9% of institutions[2]. The surgery resident at 83.1 hours a week and the psychiatry resident at 49.5 hours receive the same base check.

The stipend

The average first-year stipend was $68,166 in the 2025 national survey covering 350 nonprofit teaching institutions and 114,361 residents and fellows[1]. Stipend growth has trailed inflation.

Almost every hospital pays the same base across fields: 96.9% of institutions[2]. The surgery resident at 83.1 hours a week and the psychiatry resident at 49.5 hours receive the same base check.

Source: AMA / AAMC Survey of Resident/Fellow Stipends and Benefits 2025.

The hourly math

Inputs: $68,166 per year[1]. Fifty-two weeks. Specialty hours from the 2025 survey of 479 residents and fellows[3].

What the stipend works out to per hour
ScheduleMathRate
Base weekly pay$68,166 / 52$1,310.88/week
At the 80-hour cap$1,310.88 / 80$16.39/hr[7]
General surgery (83.1 hr/wk)$1,310.88 / 83.1$15.77/hr[5]
Psychiatry (49.5 hr/wk)$1,310.88 / 49.5$26.48/hr[6]
If the stipend covered 40 hours$1,310.88 / 40$32.77/hr

One Los Angeles chief resident estimated county residents earn less than $18 an hour[28]. The math above supports that magnitude.

For scale: the federal minimum wage is $7.25 an hour[19]. Residents earn more than that floor. They also hold medical degrees, carry life-and-death caseloads, and often owe hundreds of thousands in loans.

Sources: Resident Insider (reports $15.77 / $26.48 / $16.39 — matches our arithmetic) · KFF Health News (less than $18/hr) · 29 USC §206 ($7.25).

The degree behind the stipend

A medical degree costs dearly before residency pays anything. Four-year cost of attendance tops $286,000 at public schools and $390,000 at private schools (2024 figures; 2026 medians run $297,745 and $408,150)[16]. The class of 2025 averaged $223,130 in total education debt including premed loans[12]. Median medical-school debt was $200,000 with median premed debt of $28,000[13].

Seven in ten graduates left school with debt, and 28% — about one in four — owed over $300,000[14][15]. Tax relief is thin: the student-loan interest deduction caps at $2,500 a year with an income phaseout[20]. About 90% of indebted graduates seeking forgiveness planned to use Public Service Loan Forgiveness[21].

Sources: Credible / AAMC debt · AMA / AAMC costs and PSLF · IRS Topic 456.

A resident in scrubs reviewing bills and a laptop with a worried expression at a desk

Medicare pays hospitals to train residents

At Medicare's 1965 creation, Congress put training costs into teaching hospitals' “reasonable costs” — “including stipends of trainees” — so payments would “partially recompense salaries and benefits for house officers, administrative costs for GME, and cost of faculty”[79].

Today's mechanism runs through two channels. In fiscal 2023 Medicare paid teaching hospitals an estimated $21.2 billion for training: $6.1 billion in direct payments plus $15.0 billion in indirect payments, supporting about 112,000 trainee slots[80]. The average per-resident amount was about $133,000 for primary care and $131,000 otherwise, ranging from roughly $17,000 to $307,000 across hospitals[81]. Direct payments equal a hospital-specific amount times trainee count times Medicare patient share, rooted in base-year costs “including teaching physician and resident salaries”[82]. All federal training support runs about $29 billion[83].

We state what this does not mean. The per-resident amount is not a stipend: it bundles supervision and overhead and covers only Medicare's share, so a $133,000 figure never means the resident is “paid” $133,000. Indirect payments target patient-care costs, not trainee pay. The money goes to hospitals, which set stipends; the pass-through is partial by design.

Sources: Medicare GME financing history (PMC1495035) · CRS R48636 (Aug 2025) · CMS GME payment Q&A.

Taxed as employees

Resident stipends are taxable compensation. The IRS directs taxpayers to include in gross income “everything you receive in payment for personal services. In addition to wages, salaries…”[84]. On payroll tax the IRS holds that “medical residents are not students… they are full-time employees,” ineligible for the student payroll-tax exception, so resident services since April 1, 2005 are subject to payroll tax[85]. The student exception applies only where education predominates over employment[86].

The asymmetry is plain: residents owe income plus payroll tax like employees while training under student-like constraints. We claim no deduction or exclusion advice beyond these sentences.

Sources: IRS Publication 525 · IRS letter 09-0071 · IRS student-exception page.

Stipends lost real ground to inflation

Inside one AAMC table: the first-year mean rose $58,921 to $63,800 from 2020 to 2023 (+8.3% nominal) while consumer prices ran 257.8 to 305.1 (+18.4%), so the inflation-adjusted stipend fell $7,931 to $7,256 (−8.5% real)[87].

First-year mean stipend vs prices, then extended to 2025
SpanStipendPrices (CPI-U)Real change
2020 → 2023 (AAMC table)+8.3%+18.4%−8.5%[87]
2019–20 → 2025 (extended)+19.2% ($57,191 → $68,166)+25.7% (256.1 → 321.9p)−5.2%[91]

Math shown: $57,191 to $68,166 is +19.2% nominal against +25.7% prices (1.192 / 1.257 − 1 = −5.2% real)[91]. Inputs: the 2019–20 AAMC mean of $57,191[89], the 2025 mean of $68,166[1], and BLS consumer prices (2024 average 313.7; 2025 partial average 321.9 with October missing)[90].

The other side: 2023's inflation-adjusted $7,256 still sits 17.0% above the 1968–69 mean of $6,200 — the series rose for decades, then inflation beat it after 2020[88]. Nominal stipends rose every year shown. The AAMC warns respondent cohorts differ year to year, so prefer the multi-year trend over single-year steps. Our 2025 extension carries the partial-year price caveat above.

Sources: AAMC 2023 stipends report, Table 2 · AAMC 2019–20 stipends report, Table 2 · BLS CPI-U (CUUR0000SA0) via public API.

Nominal vs real stipend change, 2019 to 2025 The raise that was a pay cut Nominal first-year mean, 2019-20→2025 +19.2% Real (CPI-adjusted) over the same span −5.2% −20% 0 +20% CPI-U rose +25.7% over the same span (2025 CPI partial-year). Source: stat-table row 91 — site arithmetic.
CEO pay vs resident pay, inflation-adjusted Two pay stories, opposite directions Nonprofit CEO comp, 2005→2015 (real) +93% Resident stipend, 2020→2023 (real) −8.5% −100% 0 +100% Different windows; both inflation-adjusted. CEO: $1.6M→$3.1M. Source: stat-table rows 92, 87 — Marcus 2018; AAMC.

Sources: [91] [92] [87]

While executive pay doubled

At 22 major nonprofit centers, mean chief-executive pay rose $1.6M to $3.1M (+93%) and finance-chief pay $740K to $1.4M (+83%) from 2005 to 2015, inflation-adjusted, drawn from tax filings[92]. Gaps widened: chief executives went from 3 to 5 times orthopaedic-surgeon pay, 7 to 12 times pediatrician pay, and 23 to 44 times nurse pay[93]. Nationally over the same span, healthcare mean wages rose 8%, management 14%, and physicians 10%[94].

The pattern continued. From 2012 to 2019, nonprofit-hospital chief-executive mean pay rose 34% ($1.0M to $1.3M in 2019 dollars) while nurse mean wages rose 2.3% ($75,652 to $77,460)[95] — and the link between chief pay and care quality weakened: executives are “rewarded more for leading large hospitals or systems, but not for providing higher quality care”[96].

Stated limits: the papers compare site-specific executive pay to national clinician means, and the 22 centers are elite, not typical. Management growth partly reflects real regulatory burden. We claim no specific hospital underpays residents to fund its chief.

Sources: Du/Rascoe/Marcus, CORR 2018 (PMC6259823) · Jenkins/Short/Ho, Med Care 2025 (PMC12422613).

Same year, other clinicians

May 2025 national means from the Bureau of Labor Statistics: nurse practitioners $137,300 (median $132,300), physician assistants $141,280 (median $135,880), registered nurses $101,420 (median $97,550)[97].

2025 annual means vs the $68,166 PGY-1 mean
RoleMeanMultiple of PGY-1
Nurse practitioner$137,3002.01×
Physician assistant$141,2802.07×
Registered nurse$101,4201.49×

Ratios: $137,300 / $68,166 = 2.01×; $141,280 / $68,166 = 2.07×; $101,420 / $68,166 = 1.49× (all 2025)[98]. Growth context: physician-assistant wages rose 40% from 2000 to 2013 against 35.3% cumulative inflation[99]; from 2001 to 2017, nurses including NPs gained 9.92% cumulative median real growth, practitioners 5.68%, and physicians 37.6%[100].

Stated limits: advanced practice clinicians are fully licensed earners with different training debt, hours, and liability — this is a level comparison, not an equal-work claim. The employment-weighted national means and the unweighted institutional resident mean make ratios approximate. No sourced clinician-hours figure exists, so we make no hourly comparison. The nurse-growth cluster includes NPs rather than isolating them.

Sources: BLS OEWS May 2025 via public API · Quella/Brock/Hooker, JAAPA 2015 (PMID 25989436) · Hum Resour Health 2021 (PMC8403397).

The caps that never moved

Fairness includes the rules themselves. In 2003 the limits were 24 hours plus up to 6 additional (30 straight), call no more often than every third night, one day in seven free, and internal extra shifts inside the 80 (88 with exception)[101]. The 2011 rules capped first-years at 16 hours, set others at 24 plus 4 (28, down from 30), counted all extra shifts inside the 80, and barred first-years from extra shifts[102]. In 2017 first-years returned to 24 plus 4 — the “same schedule as other residents” — with the 80-hour week, one-in-seven, and every-third-night limits explicitly unchanged[103].

Net across 23 years: the 80-hour week, every-third-night limit, and one-day-in-seven never moved. Only the intern and extended-shift cap traveled (30 to 16 to 28) plus a handoff narrowing from +6 to +4[104]. Stability proves nothing in either direction: defenders read consensus, critics read capture. The 2017 reversal cites trial evidence — the one era change with trial backing.

Sources: ACGME 2011-CPR cost analysis (2003 + 2011 text) · ACGME press release 3/10/2017.

Moonlighting

A 2023 systematic review across 21 studies and 15,585 residents finds moonlighting common. About 25.2% of non-orthopedic residents moonlight, versus 10.3% of orthopedic residents[50]. Debt drives much of it: about half of moonlighters in one study did so to pay debt, 31% cited debt in another, and larger debt predicted more moonlighting in a 537-resident study[51].

Rules constrain it. All moonlighting counts toward the 80-hour limit, and residents in their first year may not moonlight at all[52].

The other side: moonlighting also brings extra income, autonomy, and clinical repetitions some residents value. Program leaders worry about fatigue and drift from training goals. Prevalence varies widely by specialty. We state no pay rate and no net-harm verdict, since evidence covers motives more than outcomes.

Sources: Debt systematic review (PMC10502380) · UW GME Work Hours Policy (moonlighting rules).

Union growth

The Committee of Interns and Residents, the largest housestaff union and an SEIU local, now reports over 40,000 members, up from about 31,000 in 2023 and about 20,000 in 2022[53]. In a 2025 national survey of 1,235 residents, 20% were already unionized and 63% of the rest said they would vote yes, with under 10% voting no[54]. Pay drove 88% of votes and hours drove 76%[55].

Union vs nonunion: pay differs, hours do not
GroupAverage payHours/week
Unionized residents$70,27157.3
Nonunion residents$65,45557.8

Unionized residents earned about 7% more ($70,271 versus $65,455) at effectively identical hours (57.3 versus 57.8 a week)[55]. Stanford residents voted 81% yes and later secured a 21% raise over three years. Mass General Brigham residents voted 75% yes in one of the largest groups[56].

The other side, from the same paper: union versus nonunion hours did not differ, so gains to date sit in pay plus benefits, not shorter weeks. The survey leaned junior (mostly first-year) and slightly overrepresented women plus medical specialties. Stated intent to vote yes does not equal membership. Whether unionization meets its well-being goals remains unproven and needs study. We claim no hours effect.

Sources: CIR official About page (40,000+ members) · Barger et al., JAMA Network Open 2025 (PMC11969282).

Stipend vs overtime value of an 80-hour week The overtime gap, one resident-year PGY-1 stipend $68,166 80-hr week at overtime value (1.5× past 40) $170,414 Unpaid gap: $102,248/yr. Source: stat-table row 34 — site arithmetic (overtime rule row 17).

Sources: [34]

The overtime gap

Federal law sets 1.5 times the regular rate past 40 hours a week for covered workers[17]. A separate provision exempts bona fide professional employees[18]. Whether that exemption should cover residents is a policy question we raise, not a legal claim we assert.

What would the gap look like if overtime applied? Take the $32.77 implied 40-hour rate from above:

  1. 40 straight-time hours: 40 × $32.77$1,310.80
  2. 40 overtime hours at 1.5× ($49.16)$1,966.40
  3. True weekly value at 80 hours$3,277.20
  4. Yearly value: $3,277.20 × 52$170,414
  5. Actual stipend$68,166
  6. Unpaid premium value: $170,414 − $68,166[34]$102,248 a year

This is illustrative arithmetic, not a legal claim. It sizes the missing premium. Sources: 29 USC §207 (1.5× rule) · 29 USC §213(a)(1) (professional exemption).

A note on family costs

Childcare can exceed a resident paycheck under a single-income model. The Family page works the math with clear scope.

Residents deserve overtime

Share the hourly math with one leader in your institution. Send the overtime illustration to a policymaker.

Read Recommendation 3